In a recent experiment, participants consistently underestimated how positive these exchanges would be, especially when talking to someone with opposing views, writes Clay Routledge.that thinking about politics makes them feel angry and exhausted, and that too much attention is given to disagreements between Republicans and Democrats, a Pew Research Center study shows. When asked to describe the state of politics in the U.S. today in one word, the most common response is “divisive.
The results were striking. Participants consistently underestimated how positive these exchanges would be, especially when talking to someone with opposing views. Not surprisingly, they expected conversations with those who disagreed with them to be significantly more negative than talks with like-minded individuals. However, their assumptions were wrong: The actual experiences were similarly positive regardless of agreement or disagreement.
Continue reading at Dallas Morning News.
Clay Routledge, PhD, is the Vice President of Research and Director of the Human Flourishing Lab at the Archbridge Institute. As a leading expert in existential psychology, his work focuses on helping people reach their full potential and build meaningful lives. Follow his work @clayroutledge and subscribe to his newsletter, Flourishing Fridays.
Psychology of Flourishing
In a recent experiment, participants consistently underestimated how positive these exchanges would be, especially when talking to someone with opposing views, writes Clay Routledge.that thinking about politics makes them feel angry and exhausted, and that too much attention is given to disagreements between Republicans and Democrats, a Pew Research Center study shows. When asked to describe the state of politics in the U.S. today in one word, the most common response is “divisive.
The results were striking. Participants consistently underestimated how positive these exchanges would be, especially when talking to someone with opposing views. Not surprisingly, they expected conversations with those who disagreed with them to be significantly more negative than talks with like-minded individuals. However, their assumptions were wrong: The actual experiences were similarly positive regardless of agreement or disagreement.
Continue reading at Dallas Morning News.
Clay Routledge
Clay Routledge, PhD, is the Vice President of Research and Director of the Human Flourishing Lab at the Archbridge Institute. As a leading expert in existential psychology, his work focuses on helping people reach their full potential and build meaningful lives. Follow his work @clayroutledge and subscribe to his newsletter, Flourishing Fridays.
Share:
Related Posts
For 2nd Trump Term, America Must Unite Around Progress Mindset
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are Betting on Nostalgia to Get Your Vote
What Gen Z Gets Wrong About Work